Kangana Ranaut Hrithik Roshan gave me you do not have answers for publicity
#Cosmoread: The legal battle between Hrithik Roshan and Kangna Ranaut issued a public statement. Kangana said in a statement released by Hrithik Roshan ‘s only aim is to get the public Simpathy. Kangana also said that Hrithik Roshan ‘s no need to get them Publicist. On the other hand, Hrithik Roshan said that no one can remain silent only to some extent. Silly X referred to.
Kangana statement released through counsel, what important things?
- Hrithik Roshan ‘s public statements and nothing else, is just trying to gain public Simpathy.
- After threatening to do so, he can not get away.
- Kangana and sometimes “silly X ‘did not. The use of word.Our Hrithik Roshan himself in Kangana has sent a legal notice.
- Hrithik Roshan media are a spice. Kangana can not be held guilty for it.
- Hrithik Roshan false allegations. He said that he did not know Kangana Soshiyli.
- Assuming the point of Hrithik Roshan then tell them why they were Kangana’s birthday party with the whole family. Kangana also Hrithik Roshan ‘s sister and father were at the birthday parties.
- All these things are in the public domain and it is proved that Hrithik Roshan are lying.
And what is stated in the statement of Kangana?
- Hrithik Roshan had alleged in the notice sent Kangana not help that he was in the police investigation. But these allegations are false.
- The question is that Hrithik Roshan were true, then why did he send notice imposed seven months? Asked to join us in any investigation agency has not.
- The truth is that we notice when Hrithik Roshan , he is now engaged in an effort to protect themselves.
- Hrithik Roshan said Kangana between February 16, 2016 May 24, 2014 sent 50 e-mails a day. Total 1439 e-mail saying that she herself meet them. This fact is also wrong. If 50 per day e-mail to be counted, they must be 30 thousand e-mail.
- Even if these values that e-mail is sent and if Kangana Hrithik Roshan wanted to stop them, they did not block Kangana?
Hrithik and Kangna not named in the statement, but what charge?
- Hrithik Roshan has also issued a statement through his publicist. Interestingly, it was not named anywhere Kangana.
- Hrithik Roshan said through a fake e-mail ID is no bothering them. He said that the issue of mental health and explains why they remained silent for two years.
- According to the statement, “the public are private things, so Controvrsi are stacked. The reason that people do not know the whole truth.”
- “I keep private things private resorted to the legal notice. But these people had been told that it is wrong.”
- “To the limit of decency can be kept quiet. But it has to be to break the silence, and the image of the family to be questioned.”
- “The truth is that the e-mail ID (firstname.lastname@example.org) is not mine. About two years ago, this branch of Mumbai police cyber’ve explained.”
- “Crime Branch is probing the case, and the day will come to know the ID of the man who handles the day that everything would be over.”
- “Mental health is a big issue. I’ve never made a personal attack. But the same can be said if it considers that it incorrectly interpreted my words.”
- “I want it quiet, to be still in the case, such as two years old.”
What’s the matter?
- At the end of January this year, was asked during an interview whether he Hrithik Roshan said Kangana ‘Aashiqui 3’ made out of. Please tell in the movie was going to take Kangana and Hrithik Roshan. But for some reason it did not.
- Kangana said in response, “Yes, I too have heard such things. I do not know why that silly X Partners Hrithik Roshan do this to get publicity. That chapter is over for me and I want to repeat old things . “
- His statement angered, and he tweeted Hrithik Roshan done, “the woman added my name to the media, the more chance I have with Dan Pope.”
- Hrithik Roshan the same statement about Kangna notice is sent.
- In response to the 21-page notice Kangana Tuesday. According to sources, in which he is accused of threatening to Hrithik Roshan. It is written that he did not name anyone. Therefore they can not be blamed for any defamation.